Trial name | Primary author | Year | Study design | Line of therapy | Stage | # Patients | Drug regimen | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pembrolizumab | ||||||||
NCT02054806 KEYNOTE-028 | Rugo | 2018 | Phase Ib | Heavily Pretreated | Advanced, PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 | 25 | Pembrolizumab | ORR 12% |
NCT03222856 KELLY | Perez-Garcia | 2021 | Phase II | > First Line | Advanced | 44 | Eribulin + Pembrolizumab | CBR 56.8% (95% CI 41.0–71.7) ORR 40.9% (26.3–56.8) |
NCT03051659 | Tolaney | 2020 | Phase II | Two or more lines of hormonal therapy; 0–2 lines of chemotherapy | HR+ /HER2- MBC | 88 | Arm A: Eribulin + Pembrolizumab Arm B: Eribulin | ORR 27% (95% CI 14.9–42.8) vs 34% (20.5–39.9) PFS 4.1 (3.5–6.2) vs 4.2 mo (3.7–6.1), HR 0.80 (0.50–1.26) OS 13.4 (10.4-NE) vs. 12.5 mo (8.6-NE), HR 0.87 (0.48–1.59) |
NCT03044730 | Shah | 2020 | Phase II | Median 1 prior therapy | Metastatic | 14 | Capecitabine + Pembrolizumab | ORR 14%; PFS 5.1 mo; OS not reached |
NCT01042379 I-SPY2 | Nanda | 2020 | Phase II | Neoadjuvant | cT2-4d, cN0-3 HR+ /HER2- | 40 | Arm A: Weekly paclitaxel + Pembrolizumab followed by AC Arm B: Weekly paclitaxel + placebo followed by AC | pCR 30% (95% CI: 17–43) vs. 13% (CI 7–19) |
NCT02395627 | Terranova-Barberio | 2020 | Phase II | Heavily pretreated, Metastatic ER+ , PD-L1 negative | Metastatic | 34 | Arm A: Tamoxifen + Vorinostat + Pembrolizumab (C1) Arm B: Tamoxifen + Vorinostat + Pembrolizumab (C2) | ORR 3.7% CBR 18.5% Stopped early for lack of efficacy |
NCT03725059 KEYNOTE-756 | Cardoso | 2023 | Phase III | Neoadjuvant & adjuvant | T1c-2, cN1-2 or T3-4, cN0-2; grade 3 | 1278 | Arm A: Pembrolizumab + Paclitaxel then Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide → Adjuvant Pembrolizuamb + Endocrine Therapy Arm B: Placebo + Paclitaxel then Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide → Adjuvant Placebo + Endocrine Therapy | pCR 24.3% (95% CI: 21.0–27.8) vs. 15.6% (12.8–18.6) (p = .00005) Stage II disease pCR 25.8% vs 16.7% Stage III disease pCR 21.6% vs. 13.6% N positive pCR 25.1% vs. 15.8% N negative pCR 16.9% vs. 13.1% PD-L1 + pCR 29.7% vs 19.6% PD-L1 + , ER +  < 10% pCR 57.6% vs. PD-L1 + , ER > 10% 33.3% EFS immature |
Atezolizumab | ||||||||
NCT03147040 GELATO | Voorwerk | 2023 | Phase II | First or second line | Metastatic, HER2- Lobular | 23 (18 with ER+ disease, 5 with TNBC) | Carboplatin + Atezolizumab | ORR 17%; CBR 26% 4 of 6 patienst with clinical benefit had TNBC |
Tremelimumab | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 | Vonderhiede | 2010 | Phase I | > First line | Metastatic | 26 | Tremelimumab + Exemestane | Stable disease in 42% at 12 weeks |
 | Santa Maria | 2018 | Pilot study | > First line | Metastatic | 11 | Tremelimumab + Durvalumab | ORR 0% |
Durvalumab | ||||||||
NCT02811497 METADUR | Taylor | 2020 | Phase II | > First line ER+ breast cancer |  | 9 | Arm A: Azacitazine + Durvalumab Arm B: Azacitazine + Durvalumab + vitamin C | no response |
NCT02734004 MEDIOLA | Domchek | 2020 | Phase I/II | > Third line | Metastatic | 34 | Olaparib + Durvalumab | Tolerable Safety DCR at 12 weeks 80% (90% CI: 64.3–90.9) |
NCT01042379 I-SPY2 | Pusztai | 2021 | Phase II | Neoadjuvant | Stage II-III HR+ /HER2-; MammaPrint high-risk | 65 | Arm A: Paclitaxel + Durvalumab + Olaparib Arm B: Paclitaxel | pCR 28% (95% CI 18–38) vs. 14% (9–19); MammaPrint MP1 pCR 9% (0–18) vs. 10% (5–18) MammaPrint MP2 pCR 64% (47—80) vs. 22% (13—32) |
NCT03875573 Neo-CheckRay | De Caluwe | 2024 | Phase II | Neoadjuvant | Luminal B, Mammaprint High-Risk | 135 | Arm A: AC + paclitaxel followed by preoperative radiation Arm A: AC + paclitaxel + durvalumab followed by preoperative radiation Arm C: AC + paclitaxel + durvalumab + oleclumab followed by preoperative radiation | pCR 17.8% (95% CI 6.6–28.9) vs 31.8% (18.1–45.6) vs 35.6% (21.6–49.5) |
Nivolumab | ||||||||
NCT04659551 GIADA | Dieci | 2021 | Phase II | Neoadjuvant | Stage II-IIIA, HR+ , HER2- | 43 | EC followed by Nivolumab + Troptorelin + Exemestane | pCR 16.3% (95% CI: 7.4—34.9) PAM50 basal pCR 50% vs. Luminal A pCR 9% vs. Luminal B 8% (p = 0.017) |
WJOG9917B NEWBEAT | Ozaki | 2022 | Phase II | First line | Metastatic HR+ /HER2- | 17 | Bevacizumab + Nivolumab + Paclitaxel | ORR 74% PFS 16.1 months |
NCT04109066 CheckMate 7FL | Loi | 2023 | Phase III | Neoadjuvant | Stage T1c-2, N1-2 or T3-4, N0-2 | 521 | Arm A: Nivolumab + Paclitaxel then Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide → Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Arm B: Placebo + Paclitaxel then Doxorubicin + Cyclophosphamide → Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy | pCR 24.5% (95% CI 19.4–30.2) vs. 13.8% (9.8–13.7), Difference 10.5 (4.0–16.9) PD-L1 + : pCR 44.3% (33.7–55.3) vs. 20.2% (12.3–30.4), Difference 24.1 (10.7–37.5) PD-L1-: pCR 14.2% vs. 10.7% |
Avelumab | ||||||||
NCT03147287 PACE | Mayer | 2024 | Phase II | > First line ER+ breast cancer | Metastatic | 220 | Arm A: Fulvestrant Arm B: Fulvestrant + Palbociclib Arm C: Fulvestrant + Palbociclib + Avelumab | PFS Arm A vs Arm B: 4.8 (90% CI 2.1–8.2) vs. 4.6 mo (3.6–5.9), HR 1.11 (0.79–1.55) PFS Arm A vs Arm C: 4.8 (2.1–8.2) vs 8.1 mo (3.2–10.7), HR 0.75 (0.50–1.12) ORR Arm A 7.3% (1.5–13.0), Arm B 9.0 (4.5–13.5), Arm C 13.0 (5.4–20.5) CBR Arm A 29.1 (19.0–39.2), Arm B 32.4 (25.1–39.7), Arm C 35.2 (24.5–45.9) |
Combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors | ||||||||
WJOG11418B NEWFLAME | Masuda | 2022 | Phase II | First or second line | Metastatic | 17 | Cohort 1: Nivolumab + Abemaciclib + Fulvestrant Cohort 2: Nivolumab + Abemaciclib + Letrozole | ORR 54.5% (95% CI 28.0–78.7) vs. 40.0% (11.7–76.9) Safety: Grade ≥ 3 AE: 92% vs. 100% (neutropenia, hepatotoxicity, ILD) Early termination for safety |
NCT04075604 CheckMate 7A8 | Jerusalem | 2022 | Phase Ib/II | Neoadjuvant | T ≥ 2 cm, ER+ /HER2- | 21 | Cohort 1: Nivolumab + Palbociclib + Anastrazole | 43% treatment discontinuation due to AE (hepatotoxicity, neuropenia, rash, ILD) Early termination for safety |
NCT02779751 | Rugo | 2022 | Phase Ib | Any | Metastatic | 28 | Cohort 1: Abemaciclib + Pembrolizumab + Anastrazole Cohort 2: Abemaciclib + Pembrolizumab | ORR 23.1% (95% CI 9.0–43.7) vs. 28.6% (13.2–48.7) DCR 84.6% (65.1–95.6) vs. 82.1% (63.1–93.9) Safety: High rates of grade 3 neutropenia, hepatotoxicity, and diarrhea. 2 grade 5 events in cohort 1 |
LAG-3 | ||||||||
NCT02614833 AIPAC | Wildiers | 2024 | Phase IIb | HR+ , HER2- MBC | Metastatic, ET-resistant | 226 | Arm A: Paclitaxel + Eftilagimod Alpha Arm B: Paclitaxel + Placebo | PFS 7.3 (95% CI 6.6–7.5) vs. 7.3 mo (5.5–7.5) OS 20.4 (14.3–25.1) vs. 17.5 mo (12.9–21.8), HR 0.88 (0.64–1.19) Age < 65, OS 22.3 mo (15.3–29.6) vs 14.8 (10.9–18.5), HR 0.66 (0.45–0.97) |
Selected Upcoming Clinical Trials | ||||||||
NCT06058377 SWOG2206 |  |  | Phase III | Neoadjuvant | Stage II/III ER+ /HER2-, MP2/High-2 | 3680 | Arm A: Durvalumab plus AC/T—→ Adjuvant ET Arm B: ACT → Adjuvant ET | pCR iDFS |
NCT05747794 AIPAC 3 |  |  | Phase III | First line | Metastatic, endocrine-resistant HR+ /HER2- or TNBC | 771 | Arm A: Paclitaxel + Eftilagimod Alpha Arm B: Paclitaxel + Placebo | OS |
NCT05159778 |  |  | Phase I/II | Prior CDK4/6, < 2 chemotherapies, no prior ICI | Metastatic, ET-resistant | 47 | Odetiglucan + Pembrolizumab | ORR |
NCT04895358 KEYNOTE-B49 |  |  | Phase III | Previously treated | Advanced, PD-L1+  | 800 | Arm A: Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy Arm B: Placebo + Chemotherapy | PFS in patients with CPS ≥ 10 |